argus, the god-eye

the Argus is practiced compassion
with an eye on you, as one is on me
will the god eye grant his forgiveness,?


yo soy psychohistory + mythopoeia.

I tumbl about:

the mob
combat
tribes
symbols
money
The Law & The Empire
New York City
Dominican Republic

Truth as a Woman


& other fine noise


Materialism: Colonized Locke
Twitter: ergface

Search

Find me on...

Posts I like

More liked posts

Tag Results

29 posts tagged money

The sale of Instagram brings a harsh reality into focus, the realization that the secret rooms or private spaces online where we can share, chit-chat and hang out with our friends are fading. The few safe havens that do exist are quickly being encroached upon or are next on the shopping list for a company like Google, Apple or Facebook. The few proposed alternatives are still in their infancy… And it is clear that our personal data and online interactions are so valuable that they are powering the Web’s future.

Jenna Wortham uses the sale of Instagram to raise the question, is there anywhere on the internet where we can just hang out with our friends and enjoy our privacy?

Read more: Digital Diary: Instagram and the Internet’s ‘Secret’ Places - NYTimes.com (via onaissues)

FJP: If you’re concerned about how Facebook might use all the data that Instagram collected from you (checkins, geolocation, etc.), The Next Web has an article showing you how to export your account and all that’s in it before deleting it in its entirety.

(via futurejournalismproject)

Privacy is the flip side of attention so longing for “private spaces” in an arena built on the management and valorization of attention is laughable.  Furthermore the Internet - for the most part - is driven, like most media in the U.S., by advertising, so the collecting, collating and selling of any tidbit of information containing the slightest relevancy to consumption is paramount.  The marketplace seldom recognizes the ethics and niceties of privacy.   This NYT writer’s lament over the loss of spaces (where she can just hang out with her friends) due to the “commercialization” of the Internet  sounds so clueless because every other space - physical and electronic - has been converted into a storefront.  Refer to Sut Jhally’s the Factory in the Living Room (essay and video) for a thoughtful critique of the attention economy as it applies to TV but is just as applicable here.  The fact that this is a NYT writer makes the piece more of a joke because the NYT has been taken over by advertiser-friendly lifestyle, entertainment and travel sections.  All the consumption that fits to print.

The conversion of the Internet into a playful factory that must yield dividends isn’t new.  The industrial factory commodified the physical labor of workers and now the digital factory commodifies the attention of web users - our “playful” wanderings over the Internet performed by mere fingers, eyes and consciousness is reminiscent of the strenuous physical movements of arms and legs with large machinery in industrial factories.  Both produce value.  Furthermore just as the crisis of industrial capital was the question of how to persuade frugal consumers to buy more than they needed - the installation of a voracious desire into consumer’s psyche – so the digital factory needs us all to pay more and more attention to more and more “images”.  Where the Fordist economy thrived on endless desire the Post-Fordist digital economy lives on infinite attention to every digitized detail of life.  Or what passes for life.  Really not a place for privacy.

(via pieto)

(via pieto)

(via pensamiento-serpentino)

(via ynannarising)

(via maximosis)

In a rich man’s house there is no place to spit but his face.

Diogenes of Sinope (via bbthity)

(via notational)

Arguments about debt have been going on for at least five thousand years. For most of human history—at least, the history of states and empires—most human beings have been told that they are debtors. Historians, and particularly historians of ideas, have been oddly reluctant to consider the human consequences; especially since this situation—more than any other—has caused continual outrage and resentment. Tell people they are inferior, they are unlikely to be pleased, but this surprisingly rarely leads to armed revolt. Tell people that they are potential equals who have failed, and that therefore, even what they do have they do not deserve, that it isn’t rightly theirs, and you are much more likely to inspire rage. Certainly this is what history would seem to teach us. For thousands of years, the struggle between rich and poor has largely taken the form of conflicts between creditors and debtors—of arguments about the rights and wrongs of interest payments, debt peonage, amnesty, repossession, restitution, the sequestering of sheep, the seizing of vineyards, and the selling of debtors’ children into slavery. By the same token, for the last five thousand years, with remarkable regularity, popular insurrections have begun the same way: with the ritual destruction of the debt records—tablets, papyri, ledgers, whatever form they might have taken in any particular time and place. (After that, rebels usually go after the records of landholding and tax assessments.) As the great classicist Moses Finley often liked to say, in the ancient world, all revolutionary movements had a single program: “Cancel the debts and redistribute the land.


Graeber, David (2011-07-12). Debt: The First 5,000 Years (p. 8). Random House Inc Clients. Kindle Edition. 

(via ontologicalterrorist-deactivate)


(via latinosexuality)

(via pensamiento-serpentino)

(via karadeligedustum)

(via blackwomenink)

(via somethingmorethan23-deactivated)

We had to struggle with the old enemies of peace: business and financial monopoly, speculation, reckless banking, class antagonism, sectionalism, war profiteering. They had begun to consider the Government of the United States as a mere appendage to their own affairs. We know now that Government by organized money is just as dangerous as Government by organized mob. Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today.  They are unanimous in their hate for me – and I welcome their hatred.”
Franklin Delano Roosevelt

All of this has happened before, and will happen again. The crisis of the day is more or less the old one, but improved with bigger words and different acronyms. Unfortunately this go around it is absolutely inconceivable that a leader of the mob would  be this bold.

Loading posts...